The court ruled that Google maintained its search monopoly through anti-competitive deals, but opted for relatively mild penalties rather than structural changes like a breakup. Remedies include preventing exclusive default search engine agreements and requiring Google to share its search index with competitors under certain conditions. However, the rise of AI and its potential to disrupt traditional search models influenced the judge’s cautious approach. The decision could shape the future of tech regulation, especially as AI introduces new competitive dynamics. Both Google and the government are expected to appeal parts of the ruling, leaving the long-term impact on consumers and the industry uncertain.