This episode reexamines Bigfoot sightings through a bold paleontological lens: what if witnesses are actually encountering a surviving giant ground sloth? Drawing on fossil evidence—including human-predator footprints at White Sands—and anatomical realism, the discussion argues that sloths are far more biologically plausible than bipedal apes: herbivorous, non-aggressive, stealth-adapted, and ecologically consistent with reported behavior. A personal woodland encounter is reframed through this theory, while Native American oral histories and ancient texts add cultural depth to accounts of giants. The conversation also explores behavioral clues—seasonal activity, hibernation-like patterns, and avoidance tactics—that align better with sloth ecology than primate biology. Crucially, the episode advocates for ethical, science-first fieldwork: prioritizing non-invasive documentation, genetic sampling, and collaboration with Indigenous knowledge over sensationalism or trophy-driven pursuit.